Religiosity is actually seen to be the strongest predictor from intimate prejudice within analyses

For this reason, we minimal the analyses so you’re able to participants’ attitudes toward gay someone, in the place of specific thinking evaluations anywhere between gay everyone

Extremely Puerto Ricans pursue particular interpretation of your Christian customs. Offered Christianity’s posture into the homosexuality while the a wicked life, this is simply not surprising locate a robust negative connection ranging from religiosity and you may sexual bias (Diaz, 1998; Provider, 1995). Furthermore, i questioned if religiosity you can expect to raise sexual prejudice of the broadening participants’ ethical opposition to interact that have homosexual anybody and/or perceive any connections which have gay visitors because positive. Still, an architectural model which have religiosity predicting intimate prejudice together with the almost every other data details is found to be unreliable and you can unstable. Thus, we do not believe religiosity ‘s the driving factor for everybody most other research variables. While you are an intervention to reduce individuals’ religiosity is shady, we perform highly recommend discover conversations regarding Christianity’s posture into intimate orientation instead of gay behavior inside spiritual settings (Choice, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). These affairs may lose Puerto Rican’s negative attitudes towards the gay men and you will ladies by eliminating the focus out of stigma on the homosexual personal so you can a specific intimate decisions.

In the end, i discovered no sex differences in the newest connectivity ranging from sexual prejudice as well as the studies details. However, its lack of gender change tends to be on account of the dimensions of sexual bias. The difference when you look at the product blogs within ATL and you may ATG subscales create accurate evaluations between the two subscales unfeasible. Past education wanting gender differences in perceptions towards the homosexuality modified the ATLG items text is identical except for the fresh new site group (we.age., “[Male/Female] homosexuality was a good perversion.”) (Herek, 2002a). In contrast, even the variations in intimate prejudice for our studies population was not on account of a sex dichotomy however, so you’re able to differences across intercourse roles (Sakalli, 2002). Guys which have greater salience in machismo plus its thinking out-of maleness would be to give better sexual bias among people (Cunningham, 1998). Coming research would be to mention exactly how item wording, cultural viewpoints, and you may gender variations ong Puerto Ricans.

Nevertheless, reviews anywhere between our very own design in addition to alternate model advise that religiosity, confident event which have homosexual anyone, and you may level of relationships that have gay guys and you may lesbian predict intimate prejudice much better than the brand new alternative causal channel

Our studies has several constraints. Earliest, the latest study’s cross-sectional data minimal the company temporary ordering in our parameters. Coming browse should explore the brand new causal relationships within studies parameters. Next, economic and you can resource restrictions diminished our very own capability to collect a much bigger attempt. A larger try which is often broke up into the random halves can get support a polish bride picture lot more improvement getting generated on one half new take to, if you find yourself testing the new completely-altered model regarding almost every other random 50 % of. Third, data findings could be low-generalizable getting Puerto Rican low-college communities. Though participants appeared encouraged to participate in the research, earlier lookup discover people with reasonable instructional attainment often rating highest for the intimate bias (Herek, 2002). Fourth, i don’t find out when the players interacted that have gay men otherwise lesbians whom notice-expose its sexual direction or if it assumed males and women was indeed homosexuals. 5th, the inability to assess exactly how many people missing within this for each class room within the survey restrictions the new research out of possible exposure biases. Nevertheless, because analysis range happened early in new session, we think the probability of dropouts and you will students not probably lecture possess decreased. In the long run, religiosity’s impact on sexual bias is worth better exploration. The investigation try not able to assemble information on participants’ religious associations. Given the variety of Christian way of living (85% Roman Catholic and you will 15% Protestant or other; CIA World Factbook (2005)), future training should discuss if or not religiosity’s affect intimate prejudice varies by the religious traditions.